Anchors
| Anchor text | Ref. domains ▾ | Top DR | Ref. pages | Links to target | Dofollow links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Zaros Part 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Tadle | 2 | — | 0 | 3 | 3 100% |
| Dria | 2 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| The Standard | 2 | — | 0 | 3 | 3 100% |
| Core Contracts | 2 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| highRewards can be drained because of lack of access control | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| lowIncorrect Initialization of minBoost in BaseGauge Constructor Breaks Core Contract Functionality | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| lowEIP712Base Is Incompatible With Chain Fork | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| mediumStarknet tokens deposited with use_withdraw_auto can never be withdrawn | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| mediumMissing deadline check allow pending transactions to be maliciously executed | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| high[H-04] Lender#buyLoan - Malicious user could take over a loan for free without having a pool because of wrong access control | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| medium“Uplift Fee” Incorrectly Falls Back to Minimum Fee Due to Integer Division | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Ignite | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highNative token withdrawal fails until manually approved | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| CodeHawks | 1 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| highStealing any loan opening for auction through others' lending pool | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Steadefi | 1 | — | 0 | 3 | 3 100% |
| highGauge stakers won't get any reward due to round-down in user weight calculation | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highSubtraction in `variance()` will revert due to underflow | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| stake.link | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| mediumSingle-step process for critical ownership transfer is risky | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| lowInconsistent timestamp storage when the LPNFT is transferred. | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| DittoETH | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Beedle - Oracle free perpetual lending | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| QuantAMM | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Fjord Token Staking | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| highLooping over unbounded `pendingStakes` array can lead to permanent DoS and frozen funds | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| lowIncorrect value returned by position() function | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| See the leaderboard | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highMultiple issues from unnecessary balance increase calculation in DebtToken.mint | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| mediumDivergence in the pricing method for collateral within the `calculateMinimumAmountOut()` may result in vaults transitioning into an uncollateralized state after executing swaps. | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highTokens with less than 18 decimals allow for draining of funds | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highInfinite loop breaks whitelist removal funtionality on L2 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| top five | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Tadle competition | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highSandwich attack to steal all ERC-20 tokens in the Fees contract | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Liquidity Management | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Check out full report | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| lowEvent in secondaryLiquidation could be misused to show false liquidations | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Beedle | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| acknowledged | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highAttacker can steal a loan's collateral and break the protocol | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| highFlag can be overriden by another user | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Beanstalk Part 1 competition | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| lowpayable Modifier in TradingAccountBranch::createTradingAccountAndMulticall | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| ArkProject: NFT Bridge | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| mediumNativeMetaTransaction.sol :: executeMetaTransaction() failed txs are open to replay attacks. | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Project | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| lowBroken `convertToUsdValue` calculation on tokens that have more than 18 decimal places | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
Frequently Asked Questions
What anchor texts are used to link to codehawks.cyfrin.io?
This page shows all anchor texts found in backlinks pointing to codehawks.cyfrin.io, sorted by the number of referring domains using each anchor. Anchor texts range from branded terms (like the domain name itself) to keyword-rich phrases that describe the linked content. The distribution of anchor texts reveals how other websites perceive and describe codehawks.cyfrin.io.
What is anchor text?
Anchor text is the visible, clickable text in a hyperlink. Search engines use anchor text as a signal to understand what the linked page is about. For example, if many sites link to a page using the anchor text "best running shoes," search engines infer that the page is relevant to that topic. Anchor text appears in several forms: exact-match (contains target keywords), branded (uses the company or domain name), generic (like "click here"), and naked URLs.
Why is anchor text analysis important for SEO?
Anchor text analysis helps identify potential SEO risks and opportunities. A natural backlink profile has diverse anchor texts including branded terms, generic phrases, and topic-relevant keywords. Over-optimization, where too many backlinks use the same exact-match keyword anchor, can trigger search engine penalties. Conversely, understanding which anchors drive the most authority (measured by referring domain count and DR) helps prioritize link building efforts.
How many unique anchor texts does codehawks.cyfrin.io have?
The anchor text report for codehawks.cyfrin.io displays all distinct anchor texts grouped by their hash. Each row shows how many unique referring domains use that anchor, the total number of links, and the dofollow percentage. A high number of unique anchors generally indicates a healthy, natural backlink profile with diverse link sources.