Anchors
| Anchor text | Ref. domains ▾ | Top DR | Ref. pages | Links to target | Dofollow links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| May 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| May 2004 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| October 2005 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Personal | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| cdymek's Blog! | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| September 2006 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| A Reading Story | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| August 2005 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| January 2006 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Chris Dymek: The Blog | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| Response to Hospitals Are Dramatically Overpaying for Their Technology | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Internet Day of Action: July 12, 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| August 2007 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| July 2007 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| April 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| March 2007 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| June 2006 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| September 2004 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| November 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| News | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Silly Comcast! | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| December 2006 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Work | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| June 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| BIAPA Notice: Now is the time to let our Senators know about the potential impact of cuts to Medicaid in the American Health Care Act | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| July 2005 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| May 2003 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| April 2005 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Comments feed | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| June 23, 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Two HBR Articles: Perspectives on Gender in the Workplace | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| April 2009 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| healthcare | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| July 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| April 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| June 2003 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| October 2006 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| December 2003 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Uncategorized | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| September 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Reviews | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| February 2005 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| April 2003 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| February 2009 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| September 2005 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| February 2006 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| February 2004 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| October 2004 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| January 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
Frequently Asked Questions
What anchor texts are used to link to cdymek.com?
This page shows all anchor texts found in backlinks pointing to cdymek.com, sorted by the number of referring domains using each anchor. Anchor texts range from branded terms (like the domain name itself) to keyword-rich phrases that describe the linked content. The distribution of anchor texts reveals how other websites perceive and describe cdymek.com.
What is anchor text?
Anchor text is the visible, clickable text in a hyperlink. Search engines use anchor text as a signal to understand what the linked page is about. For example, if many sites link to a page using the anchor text "best running shoes," search engines infer that the page is relevant to that topic. Anchor text appears in several forms: exact-match (contains target keywords), branded (uses the company or domain name), generic (like "click here"), and naked URLs.
Why is anchor text analysis important for SEO?
Anchor text analysis helps identify potential SEO risks and opportunities. A natural backlink profile has diverse anchor texts including branded terms, generic phrases, and topic-relevant keywords. Over-optimization, where too many backlinks use the same exact-match keyword anchor, can trigger search engine penalties. Conversely, understanding which anchors drive the most authority (measured by referring domain count and DR) helps prioritize link building efforts.
How many unique anchor texts does cdymek.com have?
The anchor text report for cdymek.com displays all distinct anchor texts grouped by their hash. Each row shows how many unique referring domains use that anchor, the total number of links, and the dofollow percentage. A high number of unique anchors generally indicates a healthy, natural backlink profile with diverse link sources.